|
Safe Asset
Asset Allocation
Many of the wealthiest people in the world owe their fortunes to different types of residual income - from stocks and bonds to investment trusts, real estate, commodities and more. In this chapter we're going to discuss the importance of asset allocation - how you spread your assets into different types of products (from safe to speculative).
When we talk about asset allocation we refer to the various vehicles in which we invest our cash. We can split our assets into three specific classes - security, buy/hold and speculative. It is advised that the largest chunk of your assets should fall into the security (approx 70%) bucket and this includes assets such as cash, ISAs, pension funds, home of residence, safe bonds and government securities. These are the safest of assets.
The next type of asset class is the "buy & hold" variety - these tend to be longer term investments that are generally safe. Assets in this class include buy & hold stocks/mutual funds and investment real estate. This type of asset is generally solid with the stocks being of high pedigree with sound fundamentals that promise much for the future. The buy & hold chunk of your total assets should include approximately 15% of your entire assets.
Finally, we come to the speculative class of assets - these are higher risk products that you jump in and out of quickly for short term financial gains. These include stocks that you trade actively (jumping in and out within a few days/weeks), IPOs, options & futures, warrants and some of the more speculative mutual funds.
Before you decide to enter into stock investment it is worth drawing up a plan so that you can set your own rules about your asset allocation (and discover where you are right now). Ultimately, The 70/15/15 rule to asset allocation will depend upon the individual investor, their risk tolerance and their mindset. You can adjust the numbers to more closely match your attitude towards risk.
Many experts believe that the asset allocation proportions should vary according to the investors age. For example those aged 40 or below may wish to employ a more aggressive strategy where only 40% of assets are in security and 30% are held each in buy/hold and speculative investments. Again, your personal circumstances, preference to risk and other influencing factors should be considered before arriving at your personal asset allocation numbers.
Your Investment Plan - The Most Important Thing To Create Before You Risk Even One Penny In The Markets.
One of my online businesses helps provide information and products to help other people set-up their own dot com businesses. One of the first things I advise my clients is to create a plan for their business. A plan puts all those thoughts in your head together, combines then with practical facts & figures and gives them a blueprint to get to exactly where they want to be in a structured and efficient way.
You've heard the motto, if you fail to plan, you plan to fail! This applies as much (if not more) to investments as it does to anything else in the world.
Here are just a small sample of things that your personal investment plan should highlight:
1. What amount of money you have available to invest and how this sum will be allocated within each different asset class.
2. How will you find suitable investments? Will you learn about them yourself or will you seek out professional advice (for example brokers or follow investment gurus).
3. How you will cope psychologically when your investments turn against you. The market moves heavily on psychology and how you react to situations can be the difference between winning and losing.
4. A more detailed plan should be created for each investment outlining the reason for the investments, as well as an entry and exit strategy.
To try and start investing without a clear plan is asking for trouble.
Remember - before you even look at an investment report, you MUST decide how your wealth will be allocated and then draw up a long term investment plan that's right for you.
Seven RED HOT Investments That Are Set To EXPLODE Over The Next Year! Discover The Hottest Seven Investments That Are Set To Take Off - FREEArticle Source: ArticlesBase.com
|
Are inflation and dollar valuations immediate concerns? (Answers: 1) (Comments: 0)
The U.S. Dollar was up sharply against all major currencies as investors flocked to safer assets following a poor housing report and concerns about Greece?s ability to shore up its budget deficit. More the most part, it was a quiet trade on Thursday as many big Forex players stood on the sidelines ahead of Friday?s U.S. Non-Farm Payrolls Report.
Gold futures declined, extending their recent losses, as the U.S. dollar rose against other major currencies, dampening the appeal of the precious metal. Gold for April delivery dropped $7.60 to $1,116.40 an ounce in electronic trading on Globex. Other metals also posted losses, with March silver dropping 19 cents to $17.06 an ounce.
Core inflation, which excludes food and energy, actually declined by 0.1%. This data and the numbers behind it show that inflation is still under control
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2010/02/consumer-price-index-rose-02-in-january-core-declined/36243/
Get the answers
|
|
What are your thoughts on this? (Answers: 2) (Comments: 0)
Many Americans today are unhappy with the Democratic Party.
Yet according to a Gallup poll conducted in July 2010, Democrats were still ahead of Republicans, 49% to 43%, in voters? generic ballot preferences for the 2010 congressional elections.
Why? A big part of the reason is voter dissatisfaction with the Republican Party. And a major reason for that dissatisfaction is that over the years voters have been fed numerous lies by Democrats and the mainstream media to discredit the GOP.
Here are five of those lies:
1. The Bush administration lied about the intelligence leading up to the Iraq War.
Two bipartisan investigations demanded by Democrats refute this myth. In 2004, the Robb-Silberman Report, along with a separate Senate Intelligence Committee report, both concluded that there was no evidence that administration officials manipulated intelligence about Saddam Hussein?s weapons programs to justify an invasion of Iraq.
2. Republicans caused the mortgage crisis.
In reality it was the Democrats who caused the mortgage crisis and stifled Republican efforts to prevent it.
First, Bill Clinton broadened the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), bypassing the Republican-led Congress and ordering the Treasury Department to rewrite the CRA rules to force banks to fulfill loan ?quotas? in low income neighborhoods.
Eventually, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were required by HUD to show that 55% of their mortgage purchases were to low and moderate income borrowers, and lending standards were lowered to meet those goals.
Intense competition caused by Fannie and Freddie?s increasing appetite for loans caused investment and commercial banks to compete for borrowers, and the looser lending standards eventually spread to higher-income and prime borrowers as well.
Then came Clinton?s most disastrous decision: he legalized the securitization of subprime mortgages that allowed the market to soar from $35 billion in risky loans in 1994 to $1 trillion by 2008, thus poisoning the entire mortgage industry.
Republicans tried to rein in Fannie and Freddie?s purchases of subprime mortgages. In both 2003 and 2005, they introduced legislation that would have required Fannie and Freddie to eliminate their investments in them. Both times their attempts were opposed by the Democrats on the Senate Banking Committee, so the bills never made it to Senate floor.
3. Eight years of Republican deregulation caused the financial crisis.
Some myths die harder than others. This is certainly one of them. Financial services were not deregulated during the Bush administration.
The repeal of the Depression-era Glass?Steagall Act in 1999, allowing banks and securities firms to be affiliated under the same roof, was supported by the Clinton administration and signed into law by the president.
Moreover, that was not the cause of the financial crisis. The crisis was caused by banks and investment firms purchasing vast numbers of bad mortgages and mortgage-backed securities.
What contributed to such a high volume of purchases? In 2004, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Democrat Annette Nazareth, who ran the market regulation division at the time, unanimously adopted a rule change known as Basel II.
Adopted by all of the world?s central bankers, Basel II was an attempt to provide greater regulation of investment firms by more accurately evaluating the types of assets they held.
Unfortunately, AAA-rated mortgages were incorrectly considered to be some of the safest assets an institution could own. As a result, Basel II allowed investment banks to leverage their assets of mortgage-backed securities at a ratio as high as 30 to 1. Thus, although Basel II wasn?t the cause of the financial crisis, it certainly contributed to the size of it.
4. Republicans are the ?party of Wall Street, big business and special interest groups.?
In the 2008 national election cycle, more campaign donations from the largest banks and Wall Street firms went to Democrats, not Republicans.
Ninety of the top one hundred corporate donors leaned Democratic, and nearly 75 percent of all hedge fund donations in that same period went to presidential candidate Obama.
Furthermore it is the Democratic Party which has deep-rooted unholy alliances with special-interest groups?labor unions, teachers unions, trial lawyers, environmental groups, community organizations such as ACORN and welfare beneficiaries?that often places the interests of those groups ahead of what?s best for the country. Their alliance with trial lawyers, for example, is why tort reform, an effective way to lower health care costs, was not included in the health care bill.
5. Democrats have always stood up for black Americans?and Republicans are either uncaring at best, or overt racists at worst.
Many Americans would be surprised to know that Martin Luther King, Jr. embraced conservative ideals.
Yet King?s choice of political affinity made perfect sense: it was R
Get the answers
|
|
In 2008, the financial crisis led investors around the world to avoid risky assets...? (Answers: 1) (Comments: 0)
In 2008, the financial crisis led investors around the world to avoid risky assets and demand relatively safe assets. This caused the:
A.) demand for U.S. treasury securities to decrease
B.) demand for the U.S. dollar to increase
C.) supply of the U.S. dollar to decrease
Question 2: Which of the following is true in an open economy?
A.) current account balance = net foreign investment
B.) domestic saving= net capital flows
C.) private saving = net foreign investment + domestic investment
D.) net exports = (minus) financial account balance
Get the answers
|
Next page: Safe Equity
Bookmark/Share This Page:
Safe Asset News
|
|